341 Anais do XXI Seminário Internacional Nanotecnologias, Sociedade e Meio Ambiente desafios jurídicos éticos e sociais para a “grande transição sustentável” (XXI SEMINANOSOMA) and collective engagement” of both the purposes and science-society co-responsibilities. In short, from our point of view, the double-sided RRI expres- sion Science with and for Society provides a triple entry to the Science of impacts that Renanosoma wishes to develop where, as mentioned, a key element of positivity stands out – steering science with right impacts. Thus, the inclusion of diverse perspectives, mutual responsibili- ty in prospective terms and a learning dimension marked by the mobi- lisation of “reflexive capital” are all brought into play at the same time. Hence, the positivity (identification of right impacts) in the RRI approach is oriented towards substantive and integrated processes of anticipation, reflection, inclusivity and responsive deliberation that serve “value-sensitive design” processes which refer to the desirable futures of science with and for society. In turn, the approach adopted by RRI theorists insists on the aspiration for the institutional and opera- tional interweaving of such processes. This aspiration translated into the integration of the RRI element as one of the three pillars of the EC’s STI policy for FP8. The orientation and objective of developing a European RRI programme was associated with two central elements of S&T policy in Horizon 2020, at two levels: a) first, to highlight the priority inclusion values in the European Research Area (ERA) and, b) second, to consider the need for research and innovation to be oriented towards solv- ing the major social challenges facing the Europe 2020 strategy. This was pointed out programmatically by a European Commission official, stating that, in his view, the RRI approach would need to be based on the principle of inclusiveness, involving all actors at an early stage (researchers, civil society organisations, industry and policy-makers), allowing innovation to be developed in a co-building mode that ‘ensures co-responsibility’. It would help meet the EU’s 2020 Vision for an ERA firmly rooted in society and responsive to its needs and ambitions, heralding a transformation from science in society to ‘science for society, with society’ (Gilles Laroche 2011 in Owen et al., 2012: 752). The interweaving of the results achieved in the S&T study with the trajectory shown in the field of public policies in ERA encapsu- lates the operational meaning of Science with and for Society accord- ing to the RRI approach work programme document for the 2014/15 biennium: It [RRI] allows all societal actors (researchers, citizens, policy makers, business, third sector organisations etc.) to work together during
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjEzNzYz